2021 NCAA Pool Results
|
Results of an "NCAA pool scoring" of each ranking
listed in Kenneth Massey's last Pre-Tournament
College Basketball Ranking Comparison
using the final 63 games of the 2021 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament.
|
1 ARG 76.000 (39/63 i.e. 20 8 6 3 2 0)
2 DUN 73.000 (39/63 i.e. 21 9 4 3 2 0)
3 BWE 72.000 (38/63 i.e. 21 7 5 3 2 0)
4 EBP 71.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 7 4 3 2 0)
4 EMK 71.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 7 4 3 2 0)
4 FAS 71.000 (39/63 i.e. 22 8 5 2 2 0)
4 LAW 71.000 (39/63 i.e. 22 8 5 2 2 0)
8 COL 70.000 (37/63 i.e. 19 9 5 2 2 0)
8 DOK 70.000 (38/63 i.e. 22 7 4 3 2 0)
8 TRP 70.000 (40/63 i.e. 24 8 4 2 2 0)
11 Average 69.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 2 0)
11 DII 69.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 2 0)
11 INC 69.000 (41/63 i.e. 24 10 4 2 1 0)
11 SAG 69.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 2 0)
11 WIL 69.000 (40/63 i.e. 24 9 3 2 2 0)
11 WMV 69.000 (37/63 i.e. 19 10 4 2 2 0)
17 BBT 68.000 (36/63 i.e. 20 7 4 3 2 0)
17 Median 68.000 (39/63 i.e. 24 7 4 2 2 0)
17 REW 68.000 (33/63 i.e. 15 8 5 3 2 0)
17 RT 68.000 (37/63 i.e. 20 8 5 3 1 0)
17 SPR 68.000 (38/63 i.e. 22 8 4 2 2 0)
17 TPR 68.000 (38/63 i.e. 22 8 4 2 2 0)
17 TRK 68.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 8 4 3 1 0)
24 CBR 67.000 (38/63 i.e. 21 9 5 2 1 0)
24 HAS 67.000 (38/63 i.e. 23 7 4 2 2 0)
24 JJK 67.000 (34/63 i.e. 18 6 5 3 2 0)
24 LEF 67.000 (38/63 i.e. 23 7 4 2 2 0)
24 PIR 67.000 (40/63 i.e. 24 9 4 2 1 0)
29 BNZ 66.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 9 4 2 1 0)
29 DOL 66.000 (37/63 i.e. 22 7 4 2 2 0)
29 POM 66.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 9 4 2 1 0)
29 RTP 66.000 (32/63 i.e. 15 7 5 3 2 0)
29 SRS 66.000 (39/63 i.e. 23 9 4 2 1 0)
34 JNG 65.000 (37/63 i.e. 22 8 3 2 2 0)
34 KPK 65.000 (37/63 i.e. 23 6 4 2 2 0)
36 FDM 64.000 (35/63 i.e. 20 7 4 2 2 0)
36 LOG 64.000 (38/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 1 0)
36 NET 64.000 (36/63 i.e. 22 6 4 2 2 0)
36 RWP 64.000 (38/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 1 0)
36 WLK 64.000 (38/63 i.e. 23 8 4 2 1 0)
41 CWL 63.000 (35/63 i.e. 20 7 4 3 1 0)
41 DCI 63.000 (36/63 i.e. 20 9 4 2 1 0)
41 KRA 63.000 (34/63 i.e. 19 7 4 2 2 0)
41 MAS 63.000 (38/63 i.e. 24 7 4 2 1 0)
41 SMS 63.000 (36/63 i.e. 20 9 4 2 1 0)
46 MOR 62.000 (37/63 i.e. 23 7 4 2 1 0)
46 SEL 62.000 (33/63 i.e. 18 7 4 2 2 0)
46 WOB 62.000 (33/63 i.e. 18 7 4 2 2 0)
49 BIH 61.000 (33/63 i.e. 19 6 4 2 2 0)
50 USA 60.000 (34/63 i.e. 19 8 4 2 1 0)
51 AP 59.000 (33/63 i.e. 18 8 4 2 1 0)
51 NOL 59.000 (34/63 i.e. 20 7 4 2 1 0)
51 PGH 59.000 (31/63 i.e. 17 6 4 2 2 0)
54 KCX 58.000 (35/63 i.e. 22 7 3 2 1 0)
55 DAV 57.000 (33/63 i.e. 20 6 4 2 1 0)
56 LMC 53.000 (37/63 i.e. 25 8 4 0 0 0)
57 SFX 52.000 (32/63 i.e. 20 7 3 1 1 0)
58 7OT 45.000 (28/63 i.e. 17 8 1 1 1 0)
Scoring:
Round 1: 1 point.
Round 2: 2 points.
Round 3: 3 points.
Round 4: 4 points.
Round 5: 5 points.
Round 6: 6 points.
'Average' is Massey comparison Mean ranking.
'Median' is Massey comparison Median ranking.
|
|
But how do the top 25 of the rankings stack up?
Here is a pool scoring based solely on the
top 25 teams in each ranking
(see explanation below).
|
1 ARG 77.352 (40.352/63 i.e. 21.352 8 6 3 2 0)
2 DUN 74.446 (40.446/63 i.e. 22.446 9 4 3 2 0)
3 Allsame 73.390 (39.227/63 i.e. 21.207 8.370 4.958 2.900 1.786 0.007)
4 BWE 72.265 (38.265/63 i.e. 21.265 7 5 3 2 0)
5 COL 71.693 (38.693/63 i.e. 20.693 9 5 2 2 0)
6 WMV 71.121 (39.121/63 i.e. 21.121 10 4 2 2 0)
7 REW 70.989 (35.989/63 i.e. 17.989 8.000 5 3 2 0)
8 FAS 70.698 (38.698/63 i.e. 21.698 8 5 2 2 0)
9 EBP 70.655 (38.655/63 i.e. 22.655 7 4 3 2 0)
9 LAW 70.655 (38.655/63 i.e. 21.655 8 5 2 2 0)
11 EMK 70.611 (38.611/63 i.e. 22.611 7 4 3 2 0)
12 JJK 69.896 (36.400/63 i.e. 19.904 6.496 5 3 2 0)
13 DOK 69.407 (37.407/63 i.e. 21.407 7.000 4 3 2 0)
14 TRP 68.452 (38.452/63 i.e. 22.452 8 4 2 2 0)
15 RT 68.269 (37.417/63 i.e. 20.565 7.852 5 3 1 0)
16 BBT 68.256 (36.256/63 i.e. 20.256 7 4 3 2 0)
17 DII 68.144 (38.144/63 i.e. 22.144 8 4 2 2 0)
18 SPR 68.110 (38.110/63 i.e. 22.110 8 4 2 2 0)
19 SAG 67.927 (37.927/63 i.e. 21.927 8 4 2 2 0)
20 Average 67.876 (37.876/63 i.e. 21.876 8 4 2 2 0)
21 INC 67.131 (39.130/63 i.e. 22.130 10.000 4 2 1 0)
22 TRK 67.122 (38.122/63 i.e. 22.122 8 4 3 1 0)
23 RTP 66.972 (33.477/63 i.e. 16.981 6.496 5 3 2 0)
24 WIL 66.794 (37.794/63 i.e. 21.794 9 3 2 2 0)
25 CBR 66.647 (37.647/63 i.e. 20.647 9 5 2 1 0)
26 TPR 66.305 (36.305/63 i.e. 20.305 8 4 2 2 0)
27 LEF 66.099 (37.099/63 i.e. 22.099 7 4 2 2 0)
28 Median 65.876 (36.876/63 i.e. 21.876 7 4 2 2 0)
29 HAS 65.588 (36.588/63 i.e. 21.588 7 4 2 2 0)
30 DOL 65.329 (36.329/63 i.e. 21.329 7 4 2 2 0)
31 KRA 65.269 (36.269/63 i.e. 21.269 7 4 2 2 0)
32 WOB 65.244 (36.244/63 i.e. 21.244 7 4 2 2 0)
33 FDM 65.123 (36.123/63 i.e. 21.123 7 4 2 2 0)
34 PIR 65.080 (38.080/63 i.e. 22.080 9 4 2 1 0)
35 POM 64.630 (37.630/63 i.e. 21.630 9 4 2 1 0)
36 BNZ 64.460 (37.460/63 i.e. 21.460 9.000 4 2 1 0)
37 SEL 64.329 (35.329/63 i.e. 20.329 7 4 2 2 0)
38 CWL 64.316 (36.316/63 i.e. 21.316 7 4 3 1 0)
39 KPK 64.267 (36.267/63 i.e. 22.267 6 4 2 2 0)
40 JNG 64.232 (36.232/63 i.e. 21.232 8 3 2 2 0)
41 SMS 64.186 (37.186/63 i.e. 21.186 9 4 2 1 0)
42 SRS 63.969 (36.969/63 i.e. 20.969 9 4 2 1 0)
43 BIH 63.378 (35.378/63 i.e. 21.378 6 4 2 2 0)
44 RWP 63.158 (37.158/63 i.e. 22.158 8 4 2 1 0)
45 DCI 62.554 (35.554/63 i.e. 19.554 9 4 2 1 0)
46 LOG 62.435 (36.435/63 i.e. 21.435 8 4 2 1 0)
47 USA 62.307 (36.307/63 i.e. 21.307 8 4 2 1 0)
48 SFX 62.293 (35.483/63 i.e. 19.647 8.853 3.992 1.992 1 0)
49 PGH 62.286 (34.286/63 i.e. 20.286 6 4 2 2 0)
50 NET 62.273 (34.273/63 i.e. 20.273 6 4 2 2 0)
51 AP 62.152 (36.152/63 i.e. 21.152 8 4 2 1 0)
52 WLK 61.910 (35.910/63 i.e. 20.910 8 4 2 1 0)
53 MOR 61.537 (36.537/63 i.e. 22.537 7 4 2 1 0)
54 MAS 61.031 (36.031/63 i.e. 22.031 7 4 2 1 0)
55 NOL 60.497 (35.497/63 i.e. 21.497 7 4 2 1 0)
56 KCX 57.494 (34.494/63 i.e. 21.494 7 3 2 1 0)
57 DAV 57.384 (33.384/63 i.e. 20.384 6 4 2 1 0)
58 LMC 52.198 (36.190/63 i.e. 24.182 8.008 4 0 0 0)
59 7OT 46.013 (29.325/63 i.e. 18.638 7.687 1 1 1 0)
Scoring:
Round 1: 1 point.
Round 2: 2 points.
Round 3: 3 points.
Round 4: 4 points.
Round 5: 5 points.
Round 6: 6 points.
Top 25 of rankings only.
Games with both teams beyond 25 or teams of same rank
given a calculated partial credit.
'Average' is Massey comparison Mean ranking.
'Median' is Massey comparison Median ranking.
'Allsame' is ranking with all teams ranked equally.
|
Explanation of the "top 25" pool scoring
(This scoring is only reasonable for comparing with a ranking
that only ranks the top 25, i.e., AP and USA.)
If at least one team in the game is ranked in the ranking's top 25,
it is clear which team the ranking chooses to win.
For all the games which a ranking's top 25 does not call in such manner,
a "most likely number of correct choices" is used,
based upon how many full rankings ranked the winner higher
for each of those games.
Wobus Sports: www.vaporia.com/sports